Atomic chessWednesday, November 1. 2006
Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
I have some problems with this article, and it makes me wonder whether there should be some guidelines for chess articles like :
- Using the standard chess notation. The notation used here reminds me from the first chess computers and reads awful. - Including diagrams when discussing a position. I found a good site for making nice diagrams easily at http://chessup.net , but there are other ones if you prefer them. Apart from this, I would never say that you should absolutely be an expert of the game you are writing an article about, but with such more than basic knowledge you would have been better of writing about why you like the game, telling anecdotes from Brainking games, etc. Atomic chess has opening theory going further than move 10 and an article saying that you should answer Nc3 by c6 and Nf3 by f6, plus some discussion about b3 and g3 that are terrible opening moves, seems a bit of a lightweight to me. Comments (3)
The article is useful for beginners who could easily fall in one of this tricks. Everyone should be warned about this almost stupid ways to lose, so that the games are fairier.
If you think it should be better you can write your own article! Comment (1)
It's coming, but it will not be about Atomic Chess, I am not expert enough
 Comments (3)
Sorry about any notation problems, it's the easier to write an article and it's quite similar to my brainking notation. But I think it's quite easy to understand, because the moves are simple and, specially, are few. Sorry about the lack of images, but I'm a newbie in brainrook and I don't know how to insert images.
Comments (2)
It is OK, you were not necessarily supposed to follow guidelines which didn't exist. I was saying this mainly for future articles, that is why I also gave the link to a diagram creation webpage.
Comments (3)
here is an interesting game, how very strong player can use small mistake ( I should play 7.Nc3 as I did somewhere else:(
http://brainking.com/cz/ShowGame?g=1902226 and definitely no 10.f3 :(( shame on me ! Comments (2)
anon, seems you dabble well in a few games--great input.
Comments (5)
Strange game!
Maybe if the whites used the long castling... Comments (2)
|
QuicksearchArchivesCategoriesSyndicate This BlogAuthor LoginBlog AdministrationQuicksearchComments about An annotated game of Extinction Chess Sat, 16.12.2006 16:54 Guess everyone gave up writing these neat articles, they wer e very helpful in games I have never played--thanks ev [...]Comments (5) about Chinese Chess Fri, 08.12.2006 15:45 tried this again-I am definetl y doing something wrong:(Comments (5) about An annotated game of Extinction Chess Tue, 05.12.2006 13:25 guess everyone is through writ ing articles--could have reall y used someone's expertise in some!Comments (5) about What is good backgammon play? Sat, 25.11.2006 15:09 what would be the best opening move?Comments (5) about Time limit for games on BrainKing Fri, 24.11.2006 14:24 Anyone have any ideas/thoughts on jungle and lines of action ?Comments (5) about Time limit for games on BrainKing Fri, 24.11.2006 13:53 Alot of ppl still are confused about this!Comments (5) about An annotated game of Extinction Chess Wed, 22.11.2006 13:44 played this and it was actuall y fun! thanksComments (5) about What is your favourite queen sacrifice ? Sun, 19.11.2006 21:00 ugh, didn't work for me #1Comments (5) about Atomic chess Sun, 19.11.2006 13:41 Strange game! Maybe if the wh ites used the long castling...Comments (2) Powered by
|
Comments ()
Comments (5)